Numerous negative articles were published on Alen Simonyan

From 21 to 31 August, 2020, the “Media Advocate” initiative followed online media reports on the Vice-speaker of the National Assembly of the Republic of Armenia, Alen Simonyan’s personality and activities.

35 leading Armenian news agencies have been monitored.

In the specified period, 125 articles were declared, 60 of which were negative, 2 were positive and 63 were neutral.

Numerous negative articles were published on RA NA Vice-Speaker Alen Simonyan.

NA Vice-Speaker Vahe Enfiajyan, referring to Alen Simonyan’s remark on Robert Kocharyan-Gagik Tsarukyan tie, noted: “Of course, we would be very happy if we had to refer to substantive discussions and questions, but unfortunately, after any public statement by the PAP chairman, there is no lack of meaningless comments and various imaginary analyzes. This time the next “discovery of the century” was made by the NA Deputy Speaker Alen Simonyan, who expressed a world-rocking idea, according to which at this stage they are witnessing the restoration of Kocharyan-Tsarukyan “friendship”.

The chairman of the youth union of the “Prosperous Armenia” party Ashot Andreasyan wrote the following on his Facebook page: “When I see Alen Simonyan, whether in the corridors of the National Assembly, or on TV or in Tumanyan’s” SAS “, the first thing that comes to my mind is the video clip of singer Juse, where Alen very gently crawls in the aquarium.”

The press referred to Alen Simonyan’s interview, where the NA Vice-Speaker, in particularly, noted: “Soros, his father or whoever they are, whose dog are they to influence the government in Armenia? Only the citizen of Armenia has an impact on Armenia. “Media published Larisa Minasyan’s reaction on this: “Larisa Minasyan, Head of the Open Society Foundations Armenia office, described the happening between her and NA Vice Speaker Alen Simonyan as an incident, in fact, blaming the authorities for not drawing borders for the former ones and for not showing them their place. She also noted that the rumors about the foundation are dangerous. She, for some reason, calls the harassment of the formers against the foundation as something against the values.”

The publication was prepared with the support of “Hayrenik” Development Foundation